Here, all you need to know is that these types of essays look into two subjects. These items might either be vastly different or closely related. It concentrates on what makes two things similar or different or various combinations of differences and similarities. Of course, if it were just about making simple comparisons then it would be too natural right?
I will post deeper, more detailed analyses soon. Please ensure that you get the exact titles from your ToK Teacher, I am unable to print the exact titles here for copyright reasons. Click hyperlinked titles to be taken to longer descriptions. Academic disciplines can overlap, but interdisciplinary approaches lead to confusion.
How do the processes of knowledge production influence the categorisation of knowledge? Are disciplines culturally defined or objectively fixed? Is the organisation of knowledge a product of a top-down or bottom up process? Is confusion a positive stage of knowledge production?
Is confusion the outcome of pre-existing assumptions which may be incorrect? What is the role of hegemony? The development of Vaccines, the debate between conventional economics and behavioural economics.
Confidence comes from knowing little, as knowledge increases doubt increases. Discuss with ref to 2 AoKs. The choice of AoKs will be absolutely crucial. I think that I would contrast Religious Knowledge with Natural Sciences initially arguing for the proposal of the title.
Then in counterargument I would use examples from RKS where increased knowledge has not increased doubt, and may have increased confidence. Further, finding examples from Nat Sciences where increased knowledge has increased doubt, and possibly reduced confidence.
RKS for the proposal Counter 1: Natsci against the propsal Argue 2: RKS against the proposal Counter 2: Without assuming uniformities there can be no knowledge.
This is a patterns vs exceptions essay.
Genre change in the Arts, the importance of exceptions in ethics. Is suspension of disbelief essential in AoKs?
I think that either approach would be acceptable. Disbelief in the Arts could be a willingness to accept the abstracted or reified, whilst disbelief in the Natural Sciences could be the use of conceptual representation in the place of empirical certainty for example molecular diagrams in Chemistry, or the description of nuclear fission in Physics.
An interesting discussion about Indigenous Knowledge Systems could posit that suspending disbelief is central to the very definition of some IKS.
By setting this up as a subjectivity vs objectivity debate it would be easier to develop the counterarguments that suspension of disbelief is not required for knowledge.
The older the discipline the higher the quality of knowledge of that discipline.What are the biggest differences between Google Maps and Apple Maps? Compare and Contrast High School versus College - It is a big step from high school to college.
The goal of this paper is to help prepare you by sharing, from personal experience, what to expect in the transition. Compare and Contrast Lesson Plans Links verified on 10/30/ Compare and Contrast Guide - student interactive from the Read Write Think site ; Compare and Contrast Lesson Plan - designed for grades K-5 ; Compare and Contrast Map - student interactive from the Read Write Think site ; Comparte and Contrast Unit - [designed for 3rd grade] eighteen page document to print.
The Writing Center Comparing and Contrasting What this handout is about This handout will help you first to determine whether a particular assignment is asking for. Guide to writing an essay. What is an essay? Essays at university need to respond to the question by developing an argument which is based on evidence and critical reasoning.
Suggestions: Venn diagrams are useful as a graphics organization tool when comparing two things (and particularly for use with younger children). Simple Venn diagrams are used, in which no more than two curves intersect at a common point.
Shared characteristics are listed in the overlapping section allowing for easy identification of which characteristics are shared and which aren't.